Saturday, October 28, 2006


It's the Great Pumpkin, Charlie Brown

Yesterday, ABC aired the animated classic, It's the Great Pumpkin, Charlie Brown. It was the 40th straight year the show has appeared on network television, but watching it last night I realized that in today's safety proof, think of the children world, it could never be made today.

In the first scene, you have 5 year old Linus struggling to carry a pumpkin up the stairs. Then you have 6 year old Lucy wander around unsupervised with a butcher's knife in order to carve the pumpkin into a jack-o-lantern. Nevermind the psychological torture she inflicts on poor Charlie Brown... from planting seeds of doubt about whether he was really invited to Violet's Halloween party to fooling him yet again by pulling the football out from under him.

And, no kids' production company would dare show that scene for fear of instilling replicable behavior in the child viewer. And of course, with the necessity of selling programming internationally, there is entirely too much text on the screen. How on earth could they sell this show to Spain today, with Linus' letter to the Great Pumpkin scrolling across the screen? It couldn't be done. No too mention, the idea of letting a couple of five year olds spend the night in the pumpkin patch together? Not gonna happen. But, thankfully, it could and did happen forty years ago and we can still enjoy the saccharine-free goodness today.
Obviously, I couldn't bring myself to blog after the Mets defeat in the NLCS.

Riddle me this... after Endy Chavez makes a play for the ages in the outfield in the top of the inning and you get men on 2nd and 3rd with 1 out in the bottom half of the inning, how do you not score? At that moment I knew they were not going to win the game. And then Beltran (who I still really like) stares at strike 3 with bases loaded, bottom of the 9th in a Game 7? That's the type of dream every kid has, and never does that play end with a called strike 3.

Bah!

As our Brooklyn Dodgers forebears said, "Wait'll next year..."

Next year they won't have their #1 and #2 pitchers watching in street clothes... Next year David Wright and Jose Reyes will be another year older and another year smarter and won't be scared by the specter of the post season... Next year, we won't let it go to a game 7, as we'll win early and be able to rest up. Though, not as much as the Tigers rested, cause it didn't really help them much, now did it?

And so, congrats to the St. Louis Cardinals. They were the best team in the post season, when it counted.

But, bah!

And it's not too late to be excited about 2007, is it?

Sunday, October 08, 2006

Onward to the NLCS...

There's just something about this team. They never give up. You never get the feeling that the game is lost. And, if you do for some unfathomable reason think that the Mets have lost; they will find a way to make you eat those words. And I wouldn't have it any other way. From Reyes and Wright to the two Carloses and everyone else, you know they believe they're going to win... and so you do too.

But, what I loved most about Game 3 was that it was won behind the bats of Dodger cast-offs Paul LoDuca and Shawn (my fellow landesman) Green.

The second sweetest words... The Detroit Tigers have eliminated the New York Yankees. The sweetest words... The Mets WIN!!! HOLY CRAP, we're going to the NLCS!!!!!!

Sunday, September 10, 2006


I's been 5 Years...

I wrote this last year for another blog, and I realize the last two posts are sort of political in tone, but I will get back to writing about television. Or, will start writing about television.

I didn't plan on having this be so long, and so I apologize if it is too long, but once I started writing, I started remembering and couldn't stop. Also, I apologize for the general rambling nature of this, but the memories kind of comes out in gushes.

In the fall of 2001, I lived on the Upper East Side and worked in SoHo, so taking the 6 train was part of my daily routine. I got a late start to work that day, and I remember seeing small groups of people talking on street corners as I made my way to the subway. I thought it was just people talking about the primary elections, so I didn't really pay attention. I also had my Walkman on, so I was in my own little world. I probably got on one of the last trains that was going downtown. It wasn't until I got off at the Spring Street station that I noticed something was seriously amiss. My office was on Broadway and Spring and as I got closer to Broadway I noticed throngs of people walking uptown with what appeared to be clay on their faces. As I turned the corner to walk into my office, I ran into a co-worker who told me that I just missed seeing her dog and husband. Obviously confused I asked why and she told me that they were told to evacuate their apartment (they lived in Tribeca). She then told me that two planes had flown into the World Trade Center. For a half a second, I didn't actually believe her, but then the weird street scenes I had witnessed made sense.

We went to our office, and instead of going to my cubicle, I went to the first office with a television set. I worked in television, so every office had a TV set, but for some reason the office was pretty much split between the VP's office I was in and the conference room in an office on the other side of the room. I just sat down and started watching. I didn't get up for probably close to an hour and a half. Then I thought that I should get in touch with my family. So, I went down to my cubicle and tried to call my parents. I couldn't get a line. I thought to check my e-mail and saw several e-mails from family and friends trying to get in touch with me. I checked in on my boss whose sister worked in the WTC. He somehow got in touch with her via phone and learned she was walking uptown via Broadway. I e-mailed my family letting them know I was okay. And then was drawn back to the television set in the other room. We saw one tower fall. And then later, saw the second one fall. I don't remember much of that day except hoping that somehow the towers had been evacuated. I tried to do the math in my head in terms of whether enough time had passed before the towers collapsed. I gave up when I realized that the loss of life that occurred just by the towers slamming into several floors of the buildings automatically made the casualty rate high. I sat there with about five other office-mates until my boss came in and told us that our building had been evacuated an hour before, only no one decided to tell us. We only found out when his sister tried to get up to see him and was told by security that she couldn't come in. She called her brother to let him know. Meanwhile I checked my e-mail again and found several messages from my sister that instead of going home, I should go straight to her apartment. An executive came around and told us that we had to get out, but made sure that people had someplace to go, cause it was obviously going to be difficult for the people who lived in Jersey or Connecticut to out of the city.

It was around 12:30 when I finally left. I walked with two friends of mine, both of whom were going to the Upper East Side, while I was only going as high as 18th Street. And, to say that the walk uptown was surreal was an understatement. The northbound view was clear and sunny, while the southern view was like something out of a disaster movie. The sky was grey and sooty. And the people. They just kept coming and coming and coming. Some with scrapes and bruises. Some bleeding. Some shocked. Others just dazed. I would classify myself as dazed. There were fire engines and ambulances and police cars streaming down the street. Store owners were handing out water to whoever passed by. We passed a couple of clinics where doctors and nurses were waiting outside to see if they could be of any help to passers-by. One nurse tried to get one of my friends to stop and sit down because she looked really pale. There was just an outpouring of support that made one glad to be a New Yorker. And to this day, whenever anyone says that they could never live in New York because the people are too mean, I just remember that day and realize they don't know New York at all.

Once we got past 14th street, it was like another world. There was no traffic, save for the occasional emergency vehicle and the people walking uptown had begun to spread out among the various side streets, so there were no longer teams of people walking up an avenue. When I got to my sister's apartment, I gave my sister and sister-in-law a hug and just sat down. My brother who worked downtown was in Rome on a business trip and my sister-in-law was trying to get in touch with him. It turns out that his company was getting everyone who was in Europe at the time to England because that was deemed a safer country, although my brother said that the people in Italy couldn't have been nicer when they heard he was an American, and more specifically a New Yorker.

Both my sister and my brother-in-law worked in the corporate world so they knew people who worked in the Trade Center and they spent the next few hours trying to get in touch with their friends. I spent my time e-mailing friends and Internet contacts to let them know I was okay, but mostly I watched CNN. It still hadn't hit me yet. At around 4 p.m., I decided that I had to go home. So, after convincing my (older) sister that I would be okay walking the 3 miles or so uptown, she let me go, but told me I had to e-mail as soon as I get there.

It was so quiet as I walked up 3rd Avenue. Usually when I walked home from work, I would cross over to 1st Avenue in the upper 30s because I liked the river view and walking past the UN building. That was most definitely not an option. There were tanks and what must have been National Guardsmen blocking the side streets along 2nd Avenue. I didn't cross over until 59th Street. Uptown things were going along as normally as they could. People were still stopping in at the Chinese restaurant to pick up dinner, but there was a hushed tone. I e-mailed my sister and checked my messages. I guess at one point it was impossible to get a line out from inside the city, so I had several phone calls from my sister's sister-in-law in Florida trying to make sure I was alright. As weird as it sounds, it felt comforting that there were people who cared enough to check up on me.

The next day I tried to give blood, but the line was around the block and a woman told those of us who were on the end of the line that we probably wouldn't be able to give. Instead she asked if there was anybody who wanted to volunteer inside. Since I had nothing better to do except go home and scare myself by watching even more CNN, I elected to stay. For the first few hours, I made some food runs and helped direct people to the proper waiting areas. In the afternoon, I was asked if being around blood bothered me. I didn't think so, so I was brought into the room where the actual donations occurred. I helped label the blood donation bags and get them ready for refrigeration (or transport). It was kind of icky, but I felt like I was doing something helpful. When I left, I wandered around the Upper East Side looking for a newspaper. A lot of people had that same idea because when I exited a store carrying a New York Times and New York Post, several people stopped me and asked me where I got them.

Since my office was below 14th Street, we weren't allowed back in until the following Monday, so on Thursday, my sister, her husband and my sister-in-law went to my parents' house in NJ for the weekend. They lived 55 minutes outside the city (with no traffic) and they got the smell and the soot from the towers. On Saturday, I went with a friend of mine who lived in Weehawken (right across the river from downtown) to pick up some necessities. She was staying with her parents for a few weeks because she was too distraught to stay in her apartment by herself (she worked at World Trade Plaza and was one of the people who had to evacuate). It was the first time I saw the skyline without the towers. While I'm somewhat used to it now, it looked like there was a hole in the city and was shocking. When we got back to the city on Sunday, things seemed to have calmed down, but the smell in SoHo on Monday morning was so strong, I can still remember it today.

One other bit of randomness about the week. My sister (whose apartment I stayed at) and her then-fiancée were supposed to get married that weekend. Although none of their close friends were killed in the Towers, they knew enough people who were mourning friends and family that after a great amount of deliberating, they decided to postpone the wedding until late October. Supposedly everyone they talked to from the rabbi to the caterers to the florists were great about a) not charging for the cancellation and b) rescheduling. Of course, they got married in the Rainbow Room around the same time that the anthrax scare was occurring at NBC and other news organizations, so they had some cancellations and no-shows due to fear. But, the last song played at their wedding was Frank Sinatra's rendition of "New York, New York," which we sang and danced to in a huge circle dance rockette style. While their entire wedding was gorgeous, that's what I'll remember the most.
What Price Agenda?

Why? Seriously... why? A madman directed a bunch of madmen to attack America and they did. And, they got lucky, taking down the Twin Towers. The government screwed up. They screwed up in tracking the growing threat in the 1980s, the 1990s and so on up until 9/10/01. Did the Clinton administration do all they could do to stop Al Queda? Probably not, but 20/20 hindsight is usually 100% accurate. Did the Bush administration do all they could during the transition and their first year in office? Probably not, though ignoring a memo that says Al Queda is determined to attack the U.S. puts the level of probability closer to 100%. And, their actions since 9/11 often leads me to wonder if there is anything this administration puts above politics... and I do include national security in that question. Take a look at Ron Suskind's book The One Percent Doctrine for more information on that.


But why come out with a movie that puts much of the blame on the Clinton Administration? And, why on ABC? ABC is, after all owned by Disney... a company that refused to distribute Fahrenheit 9/11 on the grounds that it didn't want to get into politics so close to an election. As if we're not 60 days out from the very important midterm elections, The Republicans would like to keep the House and Senate and are not above leading the public to believe that 9/11 was all the fault of the Clenis (Clinton's penis) to get there.
And, now it seems that the producers of this docudrama have an agenda. The writer, Cyrus Nowrasteh, has been called a good friend of none other than Rush Limbaugh. The director, David Cunningham founded The Film Institute, which has as its goal... "Godly transformation and revolution TO and THROUGH the Film and Television industry." If these folks don't have an agenda, then NAMBLA is just out for a good time.

Someone at ABC was asleep at the switch. Who vetted this docudrama for accuracy? And, if it doesn't matter that it's not accurate... if the emphasis is on the drama, rather than the docu, then why focus so much attention and press time on the fact that this was based on the 9/11 Commission report? If at least five of the Commissioners charged with writing this report claim numerous inaccuracies and only one commissioner is publicly behind the film (and as a paid consultant on the film, he also stands behind a sign blinking conflict of interest) isn't there something wrong? Who was in charge of publicity? Was it ABC's decision to send previews out to conservative bloggers/pundits, but not to those on the progressive side of the aisle? As we learned in the New York Post, an actor, Harvey Keitel, ended up hiring his own researcher and did his own rewrites to add accuracy. When this was happening, didn't ABC wonder why? Where was the executive in charge? And, how can ABC be so stubborn that they would ignore the public outcry and the private correspondence they've been receiving from people like President Clinton and Madeleine Albright?

I'll be honest. I don't think I would have watched this film, even without the controversy. Except for the CBS documentary by the Naudet brothers in 2002, I haven't been able to bring myself to watch any of the 9/11 programming on TV or any of the features in the theaters. So, this isn't strictly a political decision on my part. Maybe I will be able to watch such programming one day, but not today. Still, all things being equal, I hope when I am ready to watch, I don't have to worry about the agenda of the producers. Because, seriously, don't the victims of 9/11 deserve better?

Are you ready for some football??

Watch this instead of some crazy rightwing flight of fantasy.


Saturday, June 17, 2006


This just killed my friends and I... We're just outside Granville, OH on the day before another friend's wedding. We're looking for a restroom and come across this McDonald's, with a single golden arch. Is that even legal?
I just got back from seeing tick... tick...BOOM! put on by the Rubicon Theatre Company in LA. I'd seen it twice before (both in NYC) and it's a damn fine show. It somehow manages to put me on an emotional high at makes me slightly depressed that this and Rent are the only shows that the theater-going public will have from Jonathan Larson. That a guy so talented should leave us too soon makes me sad, but that he did leave two pearls behind brings the glad.

As I said, I saw the show twice in New York, once with Raul Esparaza as Jon (who was fabulous) and once with Joe McIntire (of New Kids on the Block fame - he was also great). I'm beginning to think that this is an actor-proof show because once again I walked out of the theater grateful for a fantastic theater-going experience. That I should feel that way after seeing a show once is lucky, twice is kind of surprising, but to feel the same way after seeing a show for the third time is shocking.

Set in 1990, tick... tick... BOOM! hearkens back to a more innocent New York (yes... really). Although Rudy Giuliani had yet to get to work on the Disneyfication of the city, Al Queda and Osama Bin Laden had not yet made themselves known to Americans. The set, designed by David Farley, touched upon the tragedy of 9/11, as the World Trade Center was front and center on the New York City skyline that took up the back wall of the stage.

The show resolves around Jonathan (Andrew Samonsky), a "promising young composer" who is days away from his 30th birthday. His life is in flux... his girlfriend (Tami Tappan Damiano), an aspiring dancer, has suggested that they leave the city and move to Cape Cod, his best friend (Wilson Cruz) is in the process of moving from their edge of SoHo walk-up to a deluxe apartment on the East Side, and the show he has been working on for the past five years has a critical workshop coming up. Jonathan doesn't know what to do. Does he give up on his dream of becoming the new sound of Broadway or does he sell out his dream for the BMW, doormanned apartment and corporate job?

Jonathan Larson wrote tick... tick... BOOM! in the years before RENT, and on some level it shows. It feels unfinished. I read that originally, he wrote it as a monologue with songs for himself, and on some levels it feels like it. While Cruz and Tappan Damiano are really great (both as their main characters and as several minor characters apiece) there's little meat to their roles. The exception to this is when they are singing. They are funny... they are hopeful... they are regretful... they are wise... goofy... and above all... they are powerful.

As the main character, Samonsky has more to work with and he perfectly captures the youthful exuberance of someone who knows what he wants to do, with the uneasiness that comes with realizing that it just might not work out.

Knowing what happened to Larson makes the whole evening a little bittersweet. But, I'm glad he wrote it, because it left me feeling hopeful. It's not to late, and as he wrote in a later show... you gotta live for today.

Sunday, February 26, 2006



Picture of the Day...
The Pacific Ocean is beautiful any time of day, but particularly as the sun is setting.
What's on my TiVo for the upcoming week...
As always, schedules are subject to change as I realize that a show I thought was a repeat is actually new or I decide to give a new show a chance or I get sick of watching the same repeat for the 30th time (SVU, I'm looking at you).

Sunday:
Alias (KCOP repeat)
Cold Case (CBS)
Family Guy (FOX)
American Dad (FOX)
Grey's Anatomy (ABC)

Monday:
General Hopsital (ABC)
Sense & Sensibility (TCM)
Friends (TBS)
Law & Order: SVU (USA)
Daily Show (COM)
The Colbert Report (COM)

Tuesday
Loving Evangeline
Suspicion (TCM)
General Hospital (ABC)
Law & Order: SVU (USA)
Gilmore Girls (WB)
Scrubs (x2) (NBC)
The Closer (TNT)
Cold Case (TNT)
The Daily Show (COM)
The Colbert Report (COM)

Wednesday
General Hospital (ABC)
Law & Order: SVU (USA)
Law & Order (NBC)
Law & Order (NBC)
Action in the North Atlantic (TCM)
Alias (TNT)
Alias (TNT)
Alias (TNT)
Alias (TNT)
Alias (TNT)

Thursday
General Hospital (ABC)
The Simpsons (KTTV)
Law & Order: SVU (USA)
Roy Orbison & Friends (KCET)
Wilthout at Trace (CBS)
The Daily Show (COM)

Friday
General Hospital (ABC)
Law & Order: SVU (USA)
House (USA)

Saturday
Rabbit Proof Fence (IFC)
101 Dalmatians (KTLA)
The Sting (TCM)
Law & Order: SVU (USA)
Law & Order: SVU (USA)

And, coming next week (unless my Tivo is just lying to me) the first spring training game of the New York Mets out of Port St. Lucie. Awesome!

Thursday, October 20, 2005

Picture of the Day
Who knew the deserts of Las Vegas had so many mountains.

Monday, October 17, 2005

I wrote the following when I was trying to come up with a personal statement for grad school. With a limit of 500 words, this was one of the first paragraphs to go, but I feel it encapsulates how I feel about popular culture.

There is a feeling I sometimes get when I’m watching a great movie. Or, a great television show. It’s an almost paralysis that starts in my heart and works its way out to my lungs. A smile will come to my face, and even when the scene or movie is over, I’ll find myself unable to move because I’ll just keep replaying it over and over again. I don’t get that feeling often, but when I do, it’s an amazing experience. The idea that something I’m watching on celluloid or on video can affect me to such an extent is baffling. I know that what I’m watching is fake. I know that actors are being paid an awful lot of money to say words written by a writer who has also been paid an awful lot of money to make me feel that way. But, I’m never alone in my feelings. Other people who are watching that movie or that television show are experiencing similar emotions. And they know it’s a fake also and they don’t care. It’s a powerful thing to be able to make people feel. And when it's done on a mass scale? It's awesome.
Picture of the Day

The sun sets over a blacked out New York City. Taken from my sister's apartment on the Upper West Side of New York City on August 14, 2003

Sunday, October 16, 2005

Today, I went to see the United States women's national soccer team take on Australia. After 90 minutes of regulation play, plus five minutes of stoppage play, the game ended in a 0-0 tie. Sounds boring, right? Not hardly. This USA team is not the team of the 1991 and 1999 World Cup or the 2004 Gold medal. This is a great team, but that team played together for a decade and this team looks like it's still getting to know each other. The first half they played sloppy and they really do need to talk to each other more, but they're not afraid to mix it up, and I'm looking forward to the road to the World Cup. The Australian team is a team to watch. They are big, fast and aggressive. Prior to this match, the WUSA team had not lost a game in its previous seven matches, and to play this team to a 0-0 tie, is impressive. Keep in mind that this US team has not allowed a goal in 838 minutes. They are currently 7-0-1 on the road to the 2007 World Cup. As the players get more comfortable with each other and the team starts to gel, we could be look at a powerhouse which should get more people interested in women's soccer.

And now, for the reason I started this posting. Soccer is not a boring sport. A nil-nil score does not mean nothing happened in the game. If when you think of soccer, you're thinking of how you played when you were in fifth grade, when the game was kick the ball and run after it. Kick the ball and run after it, then yes, that is a woefully boring game. But, when played correctly, as the national team certainly does (once they learn to TALK to each other on the field), it's a graceful, beautiful game. Unlike, most popular sports today, soccer is played with very little stoppage. Sure, the clock stops when there is an injury or free kick, but we're talking seconds here and even then the players are constantly moving. Compare that to baseball and football where play completely stops for 2 1/2 minutes every five minutes or so. Even basketball, manages to find the time to cut to a commercial every seven minutes or so. But soccer is played straight through. And at the elite level, every player is moving constantly.

Soccer is a beautiful sport to see in person, but boring to watch on television because the directors don't know how to shoot the game. They should take a lesson from video game programmers and model their shots after them. Don't just rely on the overhead camera because you're afraid that you're going to miss the ball on a cross field kick. Use more medium shots when short kicks are used and put more cameras on the field so you can cut to more close ups on a breakaway. The action on the field is exciting, but the viewer at home misses it when they're forced to see the field as one long shot. Breaking up the visuals will not only add to the action, but will also personalize each player which will help the sport, as well. Right now, there is no face of American soccer, either for the men or the women. There is no Mia Hamm who inspired a legion of little girls to wear her number 9. Think of it this way, if EA Sports decided to come out with a Women's Soccer video game, who should they put on the cover? Coming up empty? That's the problem. And, it's not that there aren't players who are good enough to land the cover, it's that, right now, there is no one person who clearly holds that position. If they want this team to capture the imagination of the public, like the 1999 team did, they need to do two things: a) win b) personalize the team.

Monday, October 10, 2005

Giambi as comeback player of the year?

What are the baseball fans thinking? After what the sport has gone through on the steroids issue, including having a first or second ballot Hall of Famer perjure himself in front of Congress, only to be caught by random steroid testing, why would anyone consider giving any season award to a player who is suspected (with reason) of being juiced? The reason Jason Giambi was so bad last year was because the steroids made him sick. So, now that he's healthy because he's off the stuff, he should be rewarded? No, he should be lucky that MLB's testing policy has been so lax that he got away with it for so long.
Picture of the Day...



Back in February, New York City played host to Cristof's The Gates. Of course the day I managed to make it over to Central Park, the weather was lousy, so you kind of miss the effect of miles, upon miles of orange gates placed throughout the city's largest park.
No one has actually stumbled across this blog yet, but in case anyone does, I would be remiss if I didn't offer these links for people who have considered donating to the victims of the earthquake in Southeast Asia or the victims of Katrina/Rita. So, here goes... Oxfam, or Unicef, or The International Red Cross and Red Crescent. And for victims of Katrina/Rita here... Direct Donations.
After a job interview for a development position recently, the producer wanted to know if I shared her sensibility in films. (Apparently, I don't, but that's neither here nor there.) She gave me the following homework assignment:

Coverage of a script she would messenger to me - par for the course
A list of my favorite movies
A list of the movies I love (and why)
A list of movies I think are interesting (and why)
A list of movies I think are great (and why)
A list of my favorite all time directors
A list of my favorite current directors.

At the time, I thought it was a lot of work (and considering I didn't get the job) I still kind of feel that way, but on second thought, it was a great assignment. And, while I'm still very disappointed that I didn't get the job, I really appreciate that I now have a written list of my favorites. So, without further ado, here is my homework assignment for XXXXXXX XXXXXX.

Favorite movies (not necessarily in any particular order)

Nobody's Fool
Night of the Hunter
Searching for Bobby Fisher
Persuasion
October Sky
Miracle
Night at the Opera
The Hours
Beauty and the Beast (Disney version)
Bend it Like Beckham
The Thin Man
King of the Hill
Destry Rides Again
Rebel without a Cause
Vanya on 42nd Street


Movies I love (and why)

Nobody's Fool
Films don't have to tell huge stories to get a reaction out of their audience. Nobody's Fool is a small story about a small man who realizes that even though he has rarely left the small town in which he was born, he has made a difference by both his actions and his inactions. The film makes you believe that it's never too late to start making amends for a lifetime time of mistakes, and that itís worth it when you do. It's not easy to produce a movie in which nothing grand happens, but the film perfectly encapsulates the hardships of flawed characters trying to make do in hard times. It makes you care about characters. They are sometimes unlikable, but they are always real. Within the first 10 minutes of the movie, I knew who these characters were and wanted them to succeed. Some did (Peter went back to his wife), some didn't (Carl lost his wife due to his many indiscretions) and some seemed to be on their way (Sully started to earn forgiveness from his son after a lifetime of neglect), but I always believed it and I always cared. In a 110-minute film, that's no mean feat.

Night of the Hunter
I first saw this movie on AMC and if I had known what it was about before the film started, I never would have given it a chance. But, it's an old story; I was going through a Robert Mitchum phase and I was babysitting for a family that had cable, and there was nothing else on, so I gave it a shot. I was blown away. Film noir at its darkest, it is a truly frightening movie that, at its essence, is the story of little Red Riding Hood. Mitchum plays a wolf in preacher's clothing who marries an executed bank robber's widow for the money he stashed and then killed her. Her kids, who know where the money is, take off down the river, with Mitchum hot on their trail. They find safety on the farm of Lilian Gish, as this G-d-fearing woman takes them in. It's a simple story, but first-time director Charles Laughton, along with Mitchum, makes his audience fear for the children's life. We believe, as the children do, that at any moment, Mitchum's preacher will find them. He does this with phenomenal acting from the lead actors to the character actors, at turns spooky and threatening music, and by manipulating shadows and light. In one scene when he wanted to show that Mitchum was close enough that the kids saw him, but he couldn't see them, he dressed a midget in preacher's clothing, put it on a donkey and shot it from the kid's POV to give the feeling of distance on a sound stage. Fifty years later, you can still find references in pop culture to this film, from Bruce Springsteen songs to Spike Lee movies. But, more importantly, even though I own it on DVD, if it happens to be on television, my TiVo is still ready to record it.

Persuasion
Pride and Prejudice is probably Jane Austen's best-known novel, and the BBC mini-series of that novel is one of the best adaptations out there. The recent feature film adaptation of Persuasion is not as well known, but remains one of my favorite films. In making the adaptation, they kept things close to the original source, and the actors did their part to bring Austen's words to life. Austen's characters are generally stereotypes of the landed gentry of the Victorian age. Women, especially, are prone to gossip and that's how they spend their days. In Persuasion, however, the main character Anne rarely speaks. Unmarried at the advanced age of 27, she is destined to remain a spinster. And, not meeting her father's stereotype of beauty, she is the daughter who is left behind. The filmmakers had the tough task of making us care for this character through actions, rather than words, as a woman in Anne's situation in the early 19th century would never think to speak her mind. Instead, she must live within her thoughts. Through glances and reaction shots, we see her pine for the life that might have been and gradually regain hope for a life that may still be. The filmmakers also manage to make such a character speak for the more modern audience of the early 21st century, showing that when it comes to relationships, some things never change. Audiences enjoy rooting for the overlooked ugly duckling, who is just waiting her chance to become a swan. While Ann did so within the confines of her place in society, that does not lessen the courage it took to take that chance. And, at its basest level, Persuasion has a great story and the movie kept that great story and expanded upon it using visual terms.


Searching for Bobby Fisher

The moment when your child surpasses your talent at anything is a difficult one for any parent, whether it's losing your first game of one-on-one in basketball or realizing that you can no longer help them with their math homework. But, what happens when that moment comes when your child is 10 years old, and not only is he better than you are at chess, but heís among the best in the country at playing this game. Your most likely response is to make sure that your child does not waste his gift. But, where is the line between your dream and your child's? Thatís the question that's at the base of Searching for Bobby Fisher. It's a movie with no real villains. The father thinks he has his child's best interest at heart, but how much of his son's desire to play chess is coming from him? Although at its heart, the film is the relationship between father and son, the filmmakers don't ignore the mother. She steps up to speak for her son and threatens to take him away if her husband tries to break what is good and innocent with the boy. It's a quiet scene, but Joan Allen as the mother, imbues it with a steely determination that she must be taken seriously. That type of relationship is all too rare in films today.


Movies I consider great (and why)

Citizen Kane
Citizen Kane is not one of my favorite films. Sometimes I feel that intellectually, it ought to be, but Iíve seen it several times, and while I appreciate the technical know-how evident onscreen, itís not a film I seek out. One reason for that might be because I find the story of a poor little rich boy who grows up to be a megalomaniac to be one I've seen too many times before. But, the use of shadows and lighting, Orson Welles' innovative use of sound, his use of deep focus, along with his use of flashbacks and non-linear story-telling makes the film very interesting to watch. While each of these techniques had been used in previous films, Welles was able to use them together to create a cohesive work of art. He was one of the first directors to realize that talking pictures had the capability to be something more than either silent pictures with sound or a filmed stage play. He realized it could be a work of art that used a variety of techniques to tell the story. Sixty years later, some people still have yet to see that you can make art with celluloid. That Welles realized it, when talkies were still relatively new, and put all the pieces together to give us Citizen Kane, is a great feat.

Godfather - Books 1 & 2
Where Citizen Kane makes my list due to the technical genius of Orson Welles, the Godfather films makes the list because of how well Francis Ford Coppola used the techniques of film to take what might have otherwise been an ordinary adaptation of a gangster film and turn it into an epic experience. Using superb acting and deep character studies, beautiful photography and choreography, authentic recreations of the period, a rich score and superbly-staged portrayals of gangster violence, the Godfather films elevated the genre. Thirty plus years later, it remains the touchstone by which other epic films and gangster films are measured.

Lord of the Rings: The Trilogy
Everyone knows how difficult it is to translate classic novels into really good movies. One only needs to look at the plethora of films that couldnít translate (any film based on a Kurt Vonnegut novel) to realize that. Peter Jackson took a great book trilogy and turned it into a fabulous film trilogy. I believe the main reason for that was because the film was made by people who truly cared about the material and were smart enough to stick to the central storyline. With painstaking detail, they remained true to the story, and combined that with the knowledge that they had to keep the story moving. Most importantly, they realized that there was a whole generation of readers who knew the story, so they didn't have to assume the audience was stupid and dumb everything down for them. It sounds simple, but far too many films seem to take their audience for granted. Yes, the enormous budget and outstanding technical know-how helped, but if they didn't know the story they wanted to tell, it could have been another big budgeted disaster.

Movies I consider interesting (and why)

Far From Heaven
Todd Haynes has never been one to shoot a traditional movie. He'll never be asked to film a blockbuster like King Kong, unlike Peter Jackson who was able to move easily from the indie success of Heavenly Creatures to the Lord of the Rings. But, Haynes does small, internal pictures that seem to insidiously attack middle class mores, and he does that very well. With Far From Heaven, he expanded on a theme he started with Safe, that deep sadness and pain exists in even the most seemingly perfect suburban families. But, other films have delved deep behind the suburban curtain, what makes Far From Heaven so unique? That Todd Haynes did it in the style of Douglas Sirk, the king of glossy, stylized, 50s Technicolor, melodramatic womenís weepies. Without falling into parody, Haynes used Sirk's style of lush music and bright, vibrant colors to bring to the screen a tale of forbidden love, racial tension, and other issues that are as valid today as they were in the 1950s. If you're a fan of films of that era, you realize that Far from Heaven goes beyond homage and is a film that not only works well as a movie today, but it fits in with movies from 50 years earlier. That is an amazing accomplishment.

Waking Life
The first time I saw this movie, I did not like it. One reason might have been the jet lag I was suffering, having just flown in from New York City. Another reason might have been that I was in the mood for a movie with a simple narrative structure. And a third was surely that in the weeks after September 11, I was still searching for movies with simple themes and happy endings ñ comfort food for the soul. But, this acid fueled volcano of animation? Not really what I was looking for in a 10:30 p.m. show in late October. But, my friends wanted to see it, so I saw it. And, I saw it again. And again. And one more time after that. There was always something that kept bringing me back. And then I realized that I was determined to get to the bottom of this movie that I clearly did not understand. Finally, I took a friends advice and decided to stop trying to find the story, and treat it as you do a dream and let it flow over you. I tried that, and was fascinated. I'm still not sure if I like this film, like I like my favorite movies, but it's definitely interesting. Linklater takes different styles of animation marries it to a soundtrack that includes snippets of conversations about life and dreams and a fabulous score, and it is odd and weird and it just works.


Vanya on 42nd Street

As a theater fan, I'm always hesitant to see movies that have been adapted from the stage. Unless they make changes that allow for the proper translation, something always seems to be lacking in the screen version. I think I'd rather have a camera filming a show from the middle of the orchestra pit than suffer through another pale imitation of the original. And so, it was with some trepidation that I sat down for this film. But, I was in a Julianne Moore is great phase, and it was on Showtime, so I watched it. What I saw was a fascinating exercise in theater and film. The movie starts off following the actors as they arrive at an empty theater for rehearsal of the play, Uncle Vanya. They're kissing each other hello, grabbing coffee and donuts, and going over notes with the director. And then, in this sparse space, they start running through the play. And, as much as I'm still not crazy about filmed plays, it's a great interpretation of a great play by Anton Chekhov. Once again, it leads me to believe that if you have a strong story, you can have a strong movie.

Favorite current directors
Cameron Crowe
Wes Anderson
Gillian Armstrong
Brad Bird
Ang Lee
John Sayles
Todd Haynes
Hayao Miyazaki
Sofia Coppola
Peter Jackson


Favorite all-time directors
Steven Spielberg
Joel and Ethan Coen
Frank Capra
Walt Disney
Sidney Lumet
Tim Burton
John Ford
Francis Ford Coppola
Howard Hawks
Douglas Sirk

Sunday, October 09, 2005

Alright, the Yankees won and now the series returns to Los Angeles. Or, Anaheim, more specifically. While I don't think that history actually proves my theory, I do believe that whatever team wins game four (in a five game series) or game six (in a seven game series) will win the series. And so, as much as it pains me, I do believe that the Yankees will win game five. But, let's hope I'm wrong.
Awww... the Yankee faithful are giving Bernie Williams a standing ovation as he comes to bat for the first time in this game. That's so sweet. He's DH-ing this game, and it could be the last time he appears in a Yankee uniform. He flied out to left field, but it was still a nice moment. And since he's not in the field, it's highly unlikely that he'll do something that will engender any boos. Good for them. I have a lot of respect for Yankee fans. Not all of them, of course. I've seen a number who have booed children who have the audacity to wear paraphenilia from the opposing teams. But, Yankee fans know their stuff and they are loyal. That said, I do enjoy the suicidal looks seen around the city when the Yankees lose two in a row and/or fail to make it to, let alone win the World Series.